In the fall of last year, a student
in my 12th-grade English class walked into my room wearing a hat I
knew about, but had only seen through the news media. But now here it was on
the head of a young man in the first row – a bright red cap, with the words “Make
America Great Again” printed in white letters. The student, with whom I’d been
developing a nice rapport thus far in the year, saw me look at his cap and
asked me a question.
“So, Mr. Hynes, what do you think of
Donald Trump?” he inquired.
I smiled, and gave him an answer: “I
like Donald Trump for real estate, but not for the White House,” I said.
Throughout the year, we talked on
and off about the presidential campaign, and listened to each other. When we
studied rhetoric, the student wrote about the ways in which Donald Trump was
using pathos to engage his listeners’ emotions, just as successful candidates
had done in the past, from Kennedy to Reagan to Obama. He quoted Trump speaking
in South Carolina saying, “People are fed up. They’re
fed up with incompetence. They’re fed up with stupid leaders. They’re fed up
with stupid people.”
My student understood the
power of emotional language – in this case, words of anger – to connect with
individuals more deeply than facts sometimes can. He knew that factual evidence,
or logos, wasn’t Trump’s calling card. “Donald doesn’t use facts very often,”
my student wrote. “However when he does, they are usually yelled, are slightly
vague, and tend to be large numbers.”
Later in the analysis, the
student summarized that Trump was angry, and so was he and a lot of other
Americans. Trump’s words were connecting with that anger and resonating, the
student wrote.
My personal preference is
for words that seek out avenues of fellowship, not anger. But this was no time
for me to share that preference; I did so every day through my behavior in the
classroom, after all. What I did was help my student analyze Trump’s rhetoric,
and discuss the power of pathos with him and all my students as we shared our analyses.
I also spoke with all of my
students about the issues in our nation when the time was right. As we read
Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner, we
talked about our world’s refugee crisis, and where America should stand on that
issue. When we watched and analyzed Spike Lee’s Do the Right Thing, we discussed race in America on a number of
different fronts. Throughout this time, my student remained an ardent Trump
supporter, but he engaged in all of these discussions with respect and an open
mind.
In the first half of the
year, he asked me to help him with a college essay he was writing. As I read
it, I learned that he had struggled with a family crisis not unlike one I had
experienced as a teen. I shared this with him, and helped him with the essay. Later
in the year, while modeling a presentation assignment that asked students to
connect Hamlet to their own lives, I
shared some of my teen-struggle story with the full class in making a
connection to the play.
After I’d done this and the
bell had rung, my student walked up to me in the back of the room and held out
his hand. “Mr. Hynes, I just wanted to say that I really respect you for sharing
your story like that with the class,” he said. I shook his hand and told him I
respected him for writing about his experience as well. You could tell that he
felt empowered through the sharing of stories.
I stood there, watching him
walk out of the room, and thought about how things might have turned out had I
shut him down because he supported Donald Trump. Several months later, I still
think about that moment. As one of the more than 60 million voters who
supported Hillary Clinton last week, I have every right to be deeply
disappointed in the election results. Crushed, even. But as a teacher, my
obligation is to every student.
A month into this school
year, that student stopped by my classroom while home from college and checked
in on how I was doing. We chatted, and I’m sure we will do so again when he
stops by during his Thanksgiving weekend or winter break. He wasn’t wearing the
hat this time, but we didn’t get into politics. We had something deeper to guide
our conversation – a mutual respect for each other.
No comments:
Post a Comment